is hip hop dead? due in large part to advances in modern medicine, hip hop is now just a simple sufferer of chronic disease.

acurding to stat quo, a professor of publicity for the desperate who studied stunt 101 at aftermathford under some of the subject's most renowned pioneers, decided today that a disconcerting numper of rabbers r teh gheys. i'm not entirely sure why this matters, though i understand if stat believes the charade of studio straightsters will lead to awkwardness should he foolishly extend invitation to his mixtape release orgy in their direction. there are not too many reasons why a secular person might logically find themselves curious as to another's orientation. one particular reason sticks out pretty glaringly.

which rap related figure is most likely to play with another rap related figure's rap related figure? would most queer men whip the flameboni so patriotically as to drape themselves in cartoonish constructs of girl's best friend? what self-respecting fan really cares? does a critical event count if it takes place on tour in notoriously open-minded europe?

^criminally uninspired post. the sole item of interest that, for me, has come of this poppycock is the pressing question of whether dude rocking the byrdgang blouse in the middle of the google images power abuse at top has the necessary credentials to replace heath ledger as the joker.